"WORK HARD, PLAY BY THE RULES, NEVER QUIT!"
View Article  The Prayer of Saint Arnold
The Prayer of Saint Arnold
 
Bene dic, Domine, creaturam istam cerevisae, quam ex adipe frumenti producere dignatus es: ut sit remedium salutare humano generi: et praesta per invocationem nominis tui sancti, ut, quicumque ex ea biberint, sanitatem corporis, et animae tutelam percipiant. Per Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.
 
Bless, O Lord, this creature beer, that Thou hast been pleased to bring forth from the sweetness of the grain: that it might be a salutary remedy for the human race: and grant by the invocation of Thy holy name, that, whosoever drinks of it may obtain health of body and a sure safeguard for the soul. Through Christ our Lord. Amen. 

 

View Article  Checkpoint at Gettysburg and Kings Dr. (Watch Out!)

The Montgomery County Combined Agency DUI Task Force plans to operate a sobriety checkpoint on September 26th on North Gettysburg Dr. at Kings Highway.  The checkpoint will be conducted betwen the hours of 9 p.m. and 2 a.m.  Agencies included will be the Dayton Police Department, the Miami Township Police, the Montgomery County Sheriff's Department and the Perry Township Police. 

If you find yourself in need of an attorney who has sucessfully defended checkpoint cases please contact Charles M. Rowland II at 937-879-9542 or 24 hours a day at:

 937-776-2671.

 

View Article  Responding to Critics

I am going to respond, once and for all, to the people who respond to this blog with anger and threats.  Of course, I appreciate that drunk driving is dangerous, tragic and unnecessary.  I have three children who I pray will never drive drunk and who will never be the victim of a drunk driver.  Those of you who wish harm on them are sick, mean and perverted.  Drunk driving is a crime and should be a crime.  However, I do not believe that we should abandon our constitutional protections.  We should not make exceptions to the Constitution for DUI offenses. "It is the responsibility of the patriot to protect his country from its government." (Thomas Paine)

 

We have seen the loss of Fourth and Fifth Amendment protections due to DUI hysteria.  We have seen an assault on the privilege of innocence.  Unlike third-world countries we do not require our citizens to prove their innocence.  When the law imposes “per se” presumptions that a person over a .08% (when this is not scientifically true) we force a person to prove their innocence.  When we take away defenses (see previous posts) and assume that every person has the same lungs or body mass index or body temperature, we again force the defendant to prove their innocence.  When we punish the defendant by taking away his license prior to trial we have lost our way!  When we ignore science by stating that your blood alcohol reading is the same three hours prior as it was three hours before, we have betrayed our ideals.  Treat each crime the same and require the State to prove its case.

 

I have dedicated my time and energy to defending the drunk drivers and their rights.  Why?  You should understand the importance of what is happening in this area because it sets important precedent.  Disastrous decisions in DUI law can embed themselves in law due to our tradition of common law.  When a court looks at the facts in a specific case, it applies not only statutes but decisions in appellate court cases to determine what the law is. This is the genius of, and reason for the rule of law.  Few topics are as politically “incorrect” as drunk driving. Judges have powerful pressures to rule in favor of the prosecution in DUI cases (Mothers Against Drunk Driving and their $47 million budget) are vocal in elections and in legislatures. There are few advocates for the accused or the Constitution during election campaigns.  This pressure has led to some troubling decisions:

Michigan v. Sitz. The Court held that sobriety roadblocks were permissible — despite the fact that there is no exception in the Fourth Amendment for stopping citizens without reasonable suspicion.
South Dakota
v. Neville  The Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was held inapplicable in drunk driving cases (refusing to submit to testing).

Blanton v. North Las Vegas
Even though punishable by six months in jail, fines and diver’s license suspension, there is no Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in a drunk driving case.
California v. Trombetta Although police normally have to save evidence, they do not have to save breath samples in DUI cases (even though it is easy and inexpensive to do so).

 

So what?  Again we look to precedent.  What happens today to a citizen accused of DUI will happen tommorrow to a person accused of any other crime.  In fact this has already happened.  We have seen our Ohio legislature pass unfair and constitutionally questionable, but politically popular, statutes attacking our very system, falling over themselves to look tough on drunk drivers.  It is the only crime in which the most innocent defendant is made to look as guilty as the most heinous offender.And having passed such laws relating to DUI, they are less reluctant to do so in other areas as well. 

“First they came for the drunks, but I was not a drunk so I did not speak up…..”

View Article  Watch Out! DUI Checkpoint planned for Montgomery County
This weekend the Combined Agency DUI Task Force of Montgomery County will conduct a checkpoint.  The officers will stop cars without any probable cause and make intrusive inquiries into an area formerly off limits based on Constitutional principles.  Many argue that this is un-American.  Writing for the dissent in the case of Michigan v. Sitz, Justice Stevens (joined separately by Justices Brennan and Marshall) wrote, "The most disturbing aspect of the Court's decision today is that it appears to give no weight to the citizen's interest in freedom from suspicionless unannounced investigatory seizures."  Many argue that the DUI checkpoints are pointless as they do not result in DUI arrests, instead many arrests are made for seatbelt violations and "paperwork" issues.  Others (MADD) don't care that these events are intrusive and pointless because they have "some" deterrent effect.  If you beleive that checkpoints are an un-American ("show us your papers") show of force by the government, please contact your legislatrue or write a letter to your municipal court judge.  There is hope.  Justice Thomas wrote "I am not convinced that [the checkpoint cases] were correctly decided.  Indeed, I rather doubt that the Framers of the Fourth Amendment would have considered reasonable a program of indiscriminate stops of individuals not suspected of wrongdoing."
View Article  Your Constitutional Right to a Defense

The accused in a DUI case has the right under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to present witnesses and evidence in his favor.  The Supreme Court upheld these rights in Washington v. Texas (1967), 388 U.S. 14, 19, 87 S.Ct. 1920, stating, "the right to offer testimony of witnesses, if necessary, is in plain terms the right to present a defense.  Just as an accused has the right to confront the prosecution's witnesses to challenge their testimony, he has the right to present his witnesses to establish a defense.  This right is a fundamental element of due process of law."

Given the above, how can a Judge prevent an accused drunk driver from presenting evidence against the proper functioning of the breathalyzer or that the defendant cannot present a defense based on rising alchol.  This is a fertile area for Constitutional challenge.  Until addressed it is yet another example of how DUI is treated differently in the system.

View Article  Dayton Daily News Supports Sutton over Reid

Marilyn Reid wants her old job on the commission back. She was defeated in her re-election bid in the 2006 Republican primary by Alan Anderson, but made a comeback in last spring's primary, when she prevailed in a field of six candidates. Her critics say she won only because the race was so crowded.

Ms. Reid is energetic, and when she gets hold of a concern, she runs with it. She tends to gravitate toward easy-to-understand matters and issues that are mostly in need of a cheerleader. (During the Base Realignment and Closure Commission process affecting Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, she was in her element, donning red-white-and-blue outfits and organizing the public welcoming for the BRAC committee that made a site visit.) She is rarely steeped in details.

She also has sharp edges and a reputation for looking out for her own interests. Some years ago she irritated even her friends when she considered taking a paying position on the board of elections while she also had her commission spot. In short, she has troubling blind spots.

Currently the county chairman for the Republican Party, Ms. Reid says she's stepping down from that job as soon as some junior leaders are ready to step up. (She paints the party organization as unimportant.)

Jerome "Jerry" Sutton, a Democrat, is retired, and, as such, points out that he would be the only full-time commissioner. (Mrs. Reid says her law practice is too small to be considered a distraction from doing the job.) He held high-ranking civilian positions at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and argues his management and executive skills make him well-suited for a commission position.

Mr. Sutton clearly has gotten the bug to run for political office. He's embracing the task of campaigning, and he also made an earlier unsuccessful bid for the Yellow Springs Council.

He says GreeneCounty is desperately in need of party balance on the commission, while Ms. Reid makes the case that she would bring needed gender diversity.

They each have talents and some differing points of views. Mr. Sutton deserves to show voters what he would do with the office of commissioner.

See:http://www.suttonforcommission.com/

View Article  Great Quote from Justice White (1967)
United States Supreme Court Justice Byron White in the landmark case of United States vs. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967):

Law enforcement officers have the obligation to convict the guilty and to make sure they do not convict the innocent. They must be dedicated to making the criminal trial a procedure for the ascertainment of the true facts surrounding the commission of the crime. To this extent, our so-called adversary system is not adversary at all; nor should it be. But defense counsel has no comparable obligation to ascertain or present the truth. Our system assigns him a different mission. He must be and is interested in preventing the conviction of the innocent, but, absent a voluntary plea of guilty, we also insist that he defend his client whether he is innocent or guilty. The State has the obligation to present the evidence. Defense counsel need present nothing, even if he knows what the truth is. He need not furnish any witnesses to the police, or reveal any confidences of his client, or furnish any other information to help the prosecution’s case. If he can confuse a witness, even a truthful one, or make him appear at a disadvantage, unsure or indecisive, that will be his normal course. Our interest in not convictingthe innocent permits counsel to put the State to its proof, to put the State’s case in the worst possible light, regardless of what he thinks or knows to be the truth. Undoubtedly there are some limits which defense counsel must observe but more often than not, defense counsel will cross-examine a prosecution witness, and impeach him if he can, even if he thinks the witness is telling the truth, just as he will attempt to destroy a witness who he thinks is lying. In this respect, as part of our modified adversary system and as part of the duty imposed on the most honorable defense counsel, we countenance or require conduct which in many instances has little, if any, relation to the search for truth.

Read To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee.

View Article  42% Drop in Labor Day Deaths!

COLUMBUS - Ohio state troopers say the number of people who died on state roads over the holiday weekend dropped by 42 percent from 2007 -- except for motorcyclists. Troopers said 14 people died over the weekend, down from 24 in 2007, which was a 71 percent increase over 2006.

The question is whether or not these numbers will be used to tell Americans that they have one of the safest highway systems on the planet.  More likely, these numbers will be used to justify more patrols, more government grants and more television commercials warning of drunk driving.  The facts are, if the numbers go up or down the monied interests will continue to beat the money drum.  Our legislators never fail to listen to this beat and consistently chisle away at our cherished rights.  If you are not outraged, you are not paying attention!

View Article  Patrol fires 12 troopers in test fraud investigation

A State Highway Patrol cheating scandal involving trooper testing exams for a breath-analysis device has opened the door to potential ...   more »

View Article  Tough Economy Changes Drinking Pattern
Tough economic times may be having an impact on the way people spend their money on alcohol, but the poor ...   more »
View Article  Charlie Teaching "Politics" at Wright State

Today I began teaching Honors Political Science at my beloved alma mater, Wright State University.  I have a syllabus, a teaching assistant and a tenuous grasp of my subject matter...I'm ready to go.  I will be teaching PLS 200 (Intro to Poli Sci) to twenty very bright, very capable students.  Thanks to the Honors Department (Dr. Mary Kenton) for this fabulous opportunity.

Wright State University

www.wright.edu, drunk driving, OVI, DUI, alcohol

View Article  Friday Beer Joke
Old man Murphy had worked down at the brewery for years, but one day , he just wasn't paying attention and he tripped on the walkway and fell over into the beer vat and drowned.

The foreman thought it should be his job to inform the widow Murphy of her old man's death. He showed up at the front door and rang the bell. When she came to the door, he said, "I'm sorry to tell you, but poor old Murphy passed away at work today when he fell into the vat and drowned."

She wept and covered her face with her apron and after a time, between sobs, she asked, "Tell me, did he suffer?"

"I don't think so," said the foreman: "He got out three times to go to the men's room.
View Article  Too Many Minors Waive Right to Counsel
COLUMBUS – The American Civil Liberties Union, the Children’s Law Center, the ACLU of Ohio, and the Office of the Ohio Public Defender today filed a petition with the Supreme Court of Ohio, calling for the Court to better protect the right to counsel for children accused of a crime.

As many as 80 percent of children charged with criminal wrongdoing in some Ohio juvenile courts are not represented by counsel. Statewide, an estimated two-thirds of juveniles facing delinquency or unruly complaints in 2004 proceeded without an attorney.

“Too many young people simply do not understand the legal ramifications of proceeding without an attorney,” said ACLU of Ohio Legal Director Jeffrey Gamso. “At a minimum, we should ensure that children meet with an attorney to discuss their legal options before they’re allowed to continue unrepresented.”

Currently, Ohio law allows juveniles to waive their right to legal counsel with only the permission of the court. The petition filed today asks the Supreme Court to require every child to first consult with an attorney before being allowed to waive the right to counsel.

“Not requiring juveniles to seek legal counsel hurts children, impedes the fair administration of justice and proves costly to society,” said ACLU National staff attorney Vincent Warren. “If a child is in a correctional facility for 10 months, taxpayers spend almost $50,000. We should spend that money teaching children, not warehousing them.”

Many Ohio youth also have barriers to understanding the serious charges they may face. In Ohio, almost 75% of incarcerated youth need mental health services, and nearly half need special educational services. A growing number of cases show that youth who are not represented by an attorney are more likely to enter guilty pleas, even when they may be innocent or have viable defenses.

“Kids aren’t waiving their right to counsel for well-thought-out reasons,” said Kim Brooks Tandy, executive director of the Children’s Law Center. “They are waiving to get the process over with quickly, because they think they will seem less guilty, or because their parents unwittingly encourage them to do so.”

A recent report from the Children’s Law Center found that roughly 15% of children committed to Ohio Department of Youth Services facilities and 20% of those placed at community corrections facilities were unrepresented by counsel during their delinquency proceedings.

"For more than seven years, I’ve represented kids incarcerated in the Department of Youth Services, and I am still surprised when I interview a youth and find that this is the first time he has seen an attorney," said Jill Beeler, juvenile section supervisor, Office of the Ohio Public Defender. “It is in the best interest of all parties for a child to be fully informed of his or her rights. Ohio’s kids deserve the fairest possible judicial proceedings and stronger protections of their rights.”

View Article  Cold, Hard Facts from DAMM-MADD!
The Bureau of Statistics declares that, "If any person involved in an accident is found to have any amount of alcohol in their blood stream, the accident is declared alcohol related." i.e.; If a sober driver loses control of his car which jumps a curb and strikes a pedestrian who is drinking a glass of wine in a sidewalk cafe - that accident is declared 'Alcohol Related'.

e.g. One foggy morning on a Santa Monica freeway, a driver who struck the back of a 15 car pile-up was found to have a trace amount of alcohol in his blood stream. Subsequently the accident was declared alcohol related. It is also a regular practice to declare any accident with
'Unknown Causes'
as "Alcohol Related" as well. These misrepresentations boost the statistics which are subsequently used by MADD and the rest of the DUI Industry to site the need for increased enforcement, which of course translates into greater fine revenues.
A New England Journal of Medicine report states that, "The risk of getting into an accident while talking on a cellular phone is the same as driving with a .10% Breath Alcohol Concentration." So where are the laws against talking on a cellular phone?
Source: http://damm-madd.com/DAMMp3.shtml (This is a great site that hits the nail on the head when it comes to DUI laws)
View Article  Happy Labor Day!

Happy Labor Day! If you find yourself arrested under suspicion of drunk driving, please contact attorney Charles M. Rowland II at 937-879-9542 or at the 24 hr DUI Hotline:

937-776-2671